Resistance against Poverty, Hunger and Inequality: Say No to Corporate Raj and Government Corruption
RAPHI
(RESISTANCE
AGAINST POVERTY, HUNGER AND INEQUALITY)
SAY
NO TO CORPORATE RAJ
&
GOVERNMENT
CORRUPTION
(C) All Rights Reserved. Pencil Sketch By Muhammad Ishaaq. |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below work is based on self created scenarios, not
real. All of the characters and parties are assumed.
(© All Rights Reserved)Please note that the work cannot be shared, published or reproduced in any form without prior permission of the author.)
The following work can be useful for people to understand
how to organize non violence movement against the oppressive and powerful
structures and systems.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Name of the Group: RAPHI (Resistance Against Poverty
Hunger & Inequality)
Flag of RAPHI: Green Flag (with painting of a
person dreaming and map of Dominant-land)
Symbol of the Movement: Green Stripes
Song of the Movement:
We
are the inhabitants of the land, we want change to eat and live
We
want freedom, we want freedom, we want freedom
No
more corruption, No more suppression, No more Oppression
We
love you, We love our coming generations
Love
for us and love for you
Stop
Corruption!
Slogan of the Movement:
No
to Corporate Raj
No
Government Corruption
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A) Brief
analysis of RAPHI’s conflict, injustice
or grievance
Economic
situation of Dominant-land is not encouraging,
66.3% of Dominant-land's population lives on under $2 a day and 22.6 % under $1
a day (Report, 2011). Dominant-land's Human development Index (HDI) is
0.504, which gives the country a rank of 155 out of 187 countries with
comparable data. The HDI of a region increased from 0.366 in 1980 to 0.548
today, placing Dominant-land below the regional average. The HDI represents a push for a broader definition of well-being
and provides a composite measure of three basic dimensions of human
development: health, education and income. The above data shows extreme
economic problems in Dominant-land, causing people to face poverty, hunger,
illiteracy and ill health. In
Dominant-land I see a lot of people sleeping on roads and living in slums in
extreme poverty.
One
of the reasons is that the country is
depending more on foreign aid and less on its own resources. Tax collection
systems are not well structured and most of the people evade from paying the
taxes. According to Ministry of Finance, Dominant-land Report
2010, only 2.75 million
Dominant-land's, or 2.6 percent of the country’s estimated 190 million people,
are registered tax-payers and posses the National Tax Numbers (NTN), Federal
Borad of Revenue report said. Out of these NTN holders, only around two million people file
their returns to the tax authorities, the report said. “The compliance ratio
has always been below. The share of taxpayers to population is low when
compared with the few selected developing and developed countries, where the
share ranges between 5.7percent and 86.4 percent.” The report said that in India, the
share of taxpayers to population is 4.7 percent, in Argentina 16.5 percent,
France around 58 percent. “The share of taxpayers belonging to non-corporate
sector is close to 99 percent in the total return filers. On the other hand,
the corporate sector that contributes around 66 percent in the total income-tax
collection has a share of only one percent in the income tax base.” (Ministry of Finance)
B)
Preparation for the
Movement
All of the dialogic methods used by
the group have failed. Corporate sector is still evading taxes, government
institutions are corrupt and spending on military has increased. Now it’s time
to take action and to mobilize the masses to ask for reforms so that we can
liberate ourselves from the oppression of deficit democracy. Most of the
members of the group were initially confused as some were saying that direct
actions in the nonviolent campaigns must not be included as now we have a
democratic government. But I persuaded them with my arguments based on April
Carter chapter ,
“Democratic Argument on Direct Action” in which
she maps out that ‘direct action/ non-violence resistance’ as an
expression of democracy and active citizenship by justifying its importance
within different democratic systems and within global context. In doing so she
argues that the direct action is an expression of democratic power to challenge
the democratic deficit, violations of human rights, gross inequalities of
wealth, social, cultural and political resources. Moreover, she also contends
that the direct action is not a power of an individual rather it is a
collective power of the poor, weak or marginalized that countervails oppressive
powers like governments, discriminatory laws & policies, corrupt
institutions, deficit or discursive democracies or neoliberal economic markets etc. (Carter, 2005).
But still some were reluctant as
they believed that non-violent methods cannot bring solution to the problem and
proposed a combination of violent and non violent method. One of us told the
group that violence will give legitimacy to the government to crackdown against
the group and very soon the group would lose its power and strength. Moreover,
in case of violence woman, children and old would not be able to join us.
International community may consider us as a rebel group. So, all agreed that
violence is a contaminant in non violent struggle (L.Helvey, 2004). As Gene Sharp says, “Nonviolent struggle
is identified by what people do, not by what people believe.” (Waging Non Violent Struggle: 20th Century Practice
and 21st Centuary Potentail, 2005).
I shared
with my fellows about Dr. Martin Luther King,
As King
saw nonviolent struggle at the time, it was comprised of five elements. First,
Non Violent resistance is not the method of cowards…. It is the way of strong….
{and} it is not the method of stagnant passivity.’ Second, it does not seek the
humiliation or defeat of the opponent but, rather, understanding and awakening
of a sense of morality. Third, it is aimed at the evil that is trying to
expunge, not at the person involved. Fourth, the willingness to suffer any
consequence is transformational. Fifth, the resister refuses to use violence
but also rejects inward violence of spirit and hate, choosing instead to reach
the struggle.
(King, Mahatama Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. : Thr
Power of Non Violent Action, 2002)
In
the meeting we decided that we would meet once a week to prepare ourselves
about the non violence resistance, as it needs a complete knowledge. In the
mean time the group also organized study circles to prepare the members about
the themes of launching the movement on non violence struggle lines. The
training of the members for the movement proved to be very important. We
studied various non violent struggles around the world and come to know that
nonviolent struggles are more probable to succeed as compared to violent
struggles. We found that independence struggle in Kashmir is unsuccessful for
more than sixty years but Estonia a very small country got their struggle
through singing thus it was called Singing Revolution. They used wonderful
tactics like integration through singing, making the human chain, protecting
the television by forming human shields in front of Soviet Soldiers. In Estonia
revolution was not brought by Forest Brothers but through singing and
non-violent actions.
Orange
revolution in Ukraine motivated the group as in that we observed that in a
nonviolent struggle can rectify the corruption and even the worse oppressor can
lose its power if people decide not to be silent. At the point one of the
comrades also shared that silence gives the oppressor more power as Havel
asserted, “We cannot remain silent in the face of evil or violence; silence merely
encourages them” (King, The New York Times on
Emerging Democracies in Eastern Europe, 2009) and as Dr. Martin Luther
King had remarked that the freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor:
it must be demanded by the oppressed.
Role
of Otpor group in Serbian movement to bring down the Milosevic- the dictator
allowed us to understand that we need to form sub-strategies to counteract the
oppressors. We then decided to not have our organizational structural under a
single command and rather to make several leaders throughout the country so
that the arrest or execution of the leader must not hamper the movement. As we
had observed that in case of Ogani tribe movement the death of Saro Wiva also
caused an irreparable damage.
On
the basis of the above observation we decided to have decentralized
organizational structure and to develop various sub strategies. We devised a
complete strategy to convert police and security forces to be on our side. A
comprehensive media strategy was also made. Methods of Nonviolence Resistance
and pillars of support by Gene Sharp helped us in the formulation of grand
strategy and sub strategies.
GOAL
Sustainable
Human Development Reforms in Dominant-land to end hunger, poverty and
inequality in Dominant-land
Objectives
To
demand corporate sector to invest in the communities from where they are
earning
To
introduce strict measures against corporate sector to pay taxes
To
end corruption from the government by brining strict monitoring and accountability
measures
Our goal and objectives are very
clear, we do not want to overthrow the government but we demand the change of
system that has repressed and oppressed the poor of Dominant-land. We want to end
the exploitation of the people of Dominant-land, we demand to end hunger,
poverty and Inequality. We are the voice of poor, hungry and marginalized
people of Dominant-land. Our name is RAPHI (Resistance Against Poverty
Hunger & Inequality).
We know
that the judicial system shall be our strength as the lawyer community is
struggling for the prosperity of Dominant-land and trying to stop government
from corruption. Our movement shall be a boast to the processes. But still the
government is very strong.
C) Mechanism
of Change
We are
seeking for Conversion and accommodation: Conversion in case of parliament and
representatives of government, accommodation for the corporate sector.
Corruption cannot be eradicated without conversion. If hearts and minds are
corrupt, best policies and laws can be broken or new ways of corruption can be
devised {as Dr. King said that Persuasion is ultimately more effective than
coercion. The objective of non violence is to win the victory over the conflict
situation, to persuade the opponent, not to triumph over him (King, Mahatama Gandhi and Martin Luthir Kin, Jr: The
Power of Non Violent Action, 2002)} So, we want the simply conversion,
RAPHI wants its leaders to be honest. On other hand we cannot convert the
corporate sector so we are aiming at accommodations. So they should pay taxes
and do invest in the areas from which they are earning.
D) Power
Analysis
Pillars
of Support
|
Sources of Power
|
Authority
|
Material
Resources
|
Human Resources
|
Skills and
Knowledge
|
Intangible
Factors
|
Sanctions
|
Business
community
|
|
|
|||||
Civil
Servants
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Cultural
and Issue Oriented Organizations
|
|
|
|
|
|||
News
Media
|
|
|
|
||||
Military
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGOs
|
|
|
|||||
Police
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political
parties
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Religious
Organizations
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Student
Unions
|
|
|
|||||
Workers
and Labour Organizations
|
|
|
(Christopher A Mille, 2006)
Sources
of Power
|
RAPHI
Non
Violent Movement
|
Opponent
or Target Group
|
Authority
|
-3
|
+2
|
Material Resources
|
+2
|
+5
|
Human Resources
|
2
|
-2
|
Skills and Knowledge
|
+6
|
+4
|
Intangible Factors
|
-3
|
+1
|
Sanctions
|
-5
|
+7
|
From the
above power analysis we come to realize that there is a big power difference
between the oppressor and us. We need to mobilize financial and human
resources. As we are against the corporate sector, so there will be huge
difference of resources. Judicial System can give us extra edge over the
authority of the opponent. The opponent has a tremendous support from the
business community and major portion is from corporate sector. Huge bulk of
money is injected into the corrupt channels of government by the corporate
sector.
Political Space
As
discussed earlier RAPHI is pretty much sure that the Judicial System shall
completely cooperate with us as far as we would remain peaceful. Moreover, by
running and mobilizing the campaign in every district and decentralized
structure of the movement shall be an extra edge to RAPHI. But in any case we
need to remain peaceful……. Means and ends must be consistent (King, Mahatama Gandhi and Martin Luthir Kin, Jr: The
Power of Non Violent Action, 2002).
E) Non-Violent
Methods (Methods of Non violence resistance by Gene Sharp)
During
the campaign we have sequenced our campaign non-violent methods as:
1.
The Method of Non Violent Protest and Persuasion:
Formal Statements
i)
Formal speeches
ii)
Letters of Support
iii)
Mass Petition
Communication with
wider audience
i)
Slogans,
caricatures, and symbols
ii)
Banners, posters and
displayed communication
iii)
Leaflets, pamphlets
and books
iv) Sky writing
Symbolic Public
Acts
i)
Displaying of flags
and symbolic colours
ii)
Paint as protests
iii)
Symbolic Sounds
Pressures on
Individuals
i)
Fraternization
Drama and Music
i)
Humorous skits and
pranks
ii)
Performance of Play
and Music
Withdrawal and
renunciation
i)
Silence
ii)
Renouncing honors
2.
The Methods of Economic Noncooperation
Action by Consumers
i)
Consumers boycott
ii)
National consumers’
boycott
iii)
International
Consumers’ boycott
Action by workers
and producers
i)
Workmen’s boycott
Action by middlemen
i)
Suppliers and
handlers boycott
Strikes by Special
Groups
i)
Professional strikes
Combination of
Strikes and economic closures
i)
Hartal
ii)
Economic shutdown
3.
The Methods of Political Noncooperation
Rejection of
authority
Literature and Speeches
advocating resistance
Citizens’
alternative to obedience
Popular non-obedience
Action by
government personnel
General administrative noncooperation
Judicial Non cooperation
Humor, Music, Satire, Slogans,
Messaging and Branding
From
our exposure to trainings and various nonviolent struggles we know that people
do count in nonviolent struggle, we want people in the struggle. We are trying
to get the support of huge masses.
Humor and Drama From
our knowledge of Otpor tactics we are completely aware that humour and drama
can really raise the issue and can be a very useful resource in positive
increase of conflict.
There
are various volunteer issue based drama performers, stage actors and groups, we
are in contact with them and hope that they would join us.
Along
with district points of RAPHI, we are planning to adjunct drama clubs and
theatres, so that in the beginning of the campaign we are able to highlight the
issues in a humorous manner. Moreover, in the tense phases it would be a chance
to get through the mental barriers of the opponent paying way for conversion.
On
a private TV channel there is a drama, “We All are Optimist” is a wonderful
program watched by most of Dominant-landi’s, in which parody of politicians is
done. Our group is in process of lobbying with the writer and director of the
program. We are trying our best to use this celebrated drama for our movement.
Printing and
distribution of the Pamphlets to make masses aware about the
oddities of the system. The pamphlets shall contain i) the figures of profit
that corporate sector is generating from each district of Dominant-land, ii)
The heading shall be Corporate Raj and We the Poor iii) The amount of money
that is lost every year because of Government corruption. iv) The part of
budget spent on military and its comparison with budget reserved for Health and
Education. And ending with a question, “What is Security?” Do we want to spend on War or on Ourselves?
The decision is in our own hands.
Preparing for
provocation, arrests, injuries or worse
During
our training sessions and power analysis we are accessing the fact that there
will be extreme repression by security forces and secret agencies. We are
expecting arrests, killings, fractured bones and even abduction. Keeping all
this in view, we have decided to have a decentralized leadership, so that
arresting or even killing of few leaders could not affect the movement.
Moreover, we have started lobbying with lawyers and judges so that we can get
easy bail after being caught and can be well prepared before any action and can
seek legal means and solutions. Support and judicial system can be very
upsetting for the opposition. Moreover, we are devising a comprehensive media
strategy in order to highlight the issues quickly and swiftly. So, the arrests
and repression by the opposition will become a paradoxical repression. Viewing
the extreme conflicts in the final stages of the campaign, when we will act for
economic shutdown and judicial non cooperation then we are expecting a ban on
free media, for that we are also preparing for the clandestine press for
Samizdat.
Mobilization of
Financial Resources
In
the mean time we are designing the movement to be self sustaining by mobilizing
people to donate and by organizing fund raising events. Again, decentralized
system shall help us for spending the least.
To be Continued.........................................................
Bibliography
Bob, C. (2005). The Marketting
of Rebellion-Insurgents, Media, and International Activism. NewYork:
Cambridge.
Carter, A. (2005). Direct Action
and Democracy Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Christopher A Mille, e. M. (2006). Strategic
Non Violent Struggle. Boston: University for Peace.
King, M. E. (2002). Mahatama
Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr. : Thr Power of Non Violent Action. New
Dehli: Metha Publishers and Indian Council for Cultural Relations.
King, M. E. (2002). Mahatama
Gandhi and Martin Luthir Kin, Jr: The Power of Non Violent Action. New
Dehli: Indian Council for Cultural Relations and Mehta Publishers.
King, M. E. (2009). Mary E.
King. Washington DC: CQ Press.
King, M. E. (2009). The New York
Times on Emerging Democracies in Eastern Europe. Washington DC: CQ Press.
L.Helvey, R. (2004). On
Strategic Non Violent Conflict: Thinking About the Fundamentals. Boston:
Albert Einstein Institution.
Waging Non Violent Struggle: 20th Century
Practice and 21st Centuary Potentail. (2005). Bostan: Porter Sargent Publishers.
Comments
Post a Comment